Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

Vol. 1, 26 December 2021


Open Access | Article

Virtual Influencers: Walking Around the Boundary of Real and Virtual

Jiang Mei * 1
1 Institute of Journalism and Communication, Wuhan University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Advances in Humanities Research, Vol. 1, 104-113
Published 26 December 2021. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Jiang Mei. Virtual Influencers: Walking Around the Boundary of Real and Virtual. LNEP (2021) Vol. 1: 104-113. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7048/1/ICEIPI_175.

Abstract

As a new agent appearing on social network, virtual influencers are becoming a strong force to be reckoned with worldwide due to their hyper-realistic appearance and distinctive personality, which sparks hot discussion of real and virtual issues in social media. This paper take an Instagram virtual influencer, Imma as analysis object, explores her interaction with followers in light of parasocial theory. Case study and content analysis have been used as main methods. Through analysis, it can be proposed that the reality in social media should not be limited to physical form of entity, and the reality in psychological existence is also a type of reality.

Keywords

virtual influencer, real, virtual, social media

References

1. The Top Instagram Virtual Influencer in 2020. (2020). Retrieved from https://hypeauditor.com/blog/the-top￾instagram-virtual-influencers-in-2020/

2. Jayson L.Dibble, Tilo Hartmann, Sarah F. Rosaen. (2016) Parasocial Interaction and Parasocial Relationship:Conceptual Clarification and a Critical Assessment of Measures. Human Communication Research, 42:21-44.

3. Chung,S. and Cho,H. (2017) Fostering parasocial relationship with celebrities on social media:implications for celebrity endorsement.Psychology& Marketing, 34(4):481-495.

4. Levy,M.R. (1979) Watching TV news as para-social interaction.Journal of Broadcasting, 23:177-187.

5. Howlberg,R. (1984) Local television news audience and the para-social interaction. Journal of Broadcasting,, 28:423-429.

6. Rubin, A.M., PERSE, E.M., Powell,R.A. (1985) Loneliness,parasocial interaction,and local television news viewing.Human Communication Research, 1985, 12:155-180.

7. Rubin AM, Perse EM. (1987a) Audience activity and soap opera involvement. Hum Commun Res, 14:246-268.

8. Rubin EM, Rubin RR. (1989) Attribution in social and parasocial relationships. Commun Res, 16:59–77.

9. Kim J, Rubin AM. (1997) The variable influence of audience activitiy on media effects. Commun Res, 24:107-135.

10. Grant AE, Gutherie KK, Ball-Rokeach SJ. (1991)Television shopping: A media dependency perspective. Commun Res, 18:773-798.

11. Gudelunas D. (2006) Shopping with friends: Audience perspectives on television shopping. Popular Communication, 4:229–252.

12. Rubin,A.M., Step,M.M. (2000) Impact of motivation,attraction,and parasocial interaction on talk radio listening.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,44:635-654.

13. Rubin AM, Haridakis PM, Eyal K (2003) Viewer aggression and attraction to television talk shows. Media Psychol, 5:331–362.

14. Lewis ML, Weber R. (2008) “They May Be Pixels, But They’re My Pixels: Developing a metric of character attachment in roleplaying video games. Cyberpsychol Behav, 11:515-518.

15. Jin SA, Park N. (2009) Parasocial interaction with my avatar. Effects of interdependent self-construal and the mediating role of self-presence in an avatar-based console game, Wii. Cyberpsychol Behav, 12:723-727.

16. Auter PJ. (1992) TV that talks back: An experimental validation of a parasocial interaction scale. J Broadcast Electron Media, 36:173-181.

17. Sözen AI. (2014) Parasosyal etkileşim, terör yönetimi ve futbol fanatizmi (Uzmanlık tezi). Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi.

18. Nabi RL, Stitt CR, Halford J, Finnerty KL. (2006) Emotional and cognitive predictors of enjoyment of reality-based and fictional television programming: An elaboration of the uses and gratifications perspective. Media Psychol, 8:421–447.

19. Daniel ES, Jackson ECC, Westerman DK. (2018) The influence of social media influencers: Understanding online vaping communities and parasocial interaction through the lens of taylor’s six-segment strategy wheel. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 18:96-109.

20. Marwick, A. (2011) To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 17(2), 139-158.

21. Vonderohe BM. (2016) Twitter’s role in the disclosure of parasocial relationships. UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research, 19:1-15.

22. Kristen J.Schroath.(2016) Parasocial Interaction: Celebrity Endorsements. Kent State University, College of Communication and Information / School of Communication Studies.

23. Gözde Aytulun, Ayda Büyükşahin Sunal.(2020) Parasocial Interaction with Media Characters. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar-Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 12(4):494-506.

24. Madison TP, Porter LV. (2016) Cognitive and imagery attributes of parasocial relationships. Imagin Cogn Pers, 35:359-379.

25. Kwon, O., Wen, Y.. (2010) An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Computers of Human Behavior, 26, 254-263.

26. Wangqi Gong, Xigen Li. (2017) Engaging fans on microblog: the synthetic influenc of parasocial interaction and source characteristics on celebrity endorsement. Psychol Mark, 34:720–732.

27. Eugene Cheng-Xi Aw, Lauren I. Labrecque. (2020) Celebrity endorsement in social media contexts: understanding the role of parasocial interactions and the need to belong. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 37(7) : 895–908.

28. Kim, J. , Song, H. (2016), “Celebrity’s self-disclosure on Twitter and parasocial relationships: a mediating role of social presence”, Computers in Human Behavior, 62: 570-577.

29. Labrecque, L.I. (2014) “Fostering consumer–brand relationships in social media environments: the role of parasocial interaction”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28 (2):134-148.

30. Aline W. de Borst*, Beatrice de Gelder. (2015) Is it the real deal? Perception of virtual characters versus humans: an affective cognitive neuroscience perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 6: 576.

31. Mike Poznanski, Paul Thagard. (2005) Changing personalities: towards realistic virtual characters.Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 17(3):221-241.

32. Katja Zibrek, Elena Kokkinara, Rachel McDonnell. (2018) The Effect of Realistic Appearance of Virtual Characters in Immersive Environments - Does the Character’s Personality Play a Role?. Ieee Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(4):1681-1689.

33. Anna Darner, Nickie Arvidsson. (2019) Virtual Influencers - anonymous celebrities on social media .Informatics

34. Ben Robinson. (2020) Towards an Ontology and Ethics of Virtual Influencers. Australasian Journal of Information Systems Robinson, 24: 1-7.

35. Chung, S., & Cho, H. (2014). Effects of parasocial relationship, reality TV, and social media on celebrity endorsement. Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School of Business.

36. Sun, T. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of parasocial interaction with sport athletes and identification with sports teams. Journal of Sports Behavior, 33, 194-217.

37. Turner, J. R. (1993). Interpersonal and psychological predictors of parasocial interaction with different television performers. Communication Quarterly, 41, 443-453.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries (ICEIPI 2021), Part 1
ISBN (Print)
978-1-915371-00-3
ISBN (Online)
978-1-915371-01-0
Published Date
26 December 2021
Series
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
ISSN (Print)
2753-7048
ISSN (Online)
2753-7056
DOI
10.54254/2753-7048/1/ICEIPI_175
Copyright
© 2023 The Author(s)
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated